Page cover
githubEdit

Importance of a Security Operations Center (SOC)

By Adrian Anglin Published: December 25, 2025


In an environment where attackers exfiltrate data within 24 hours, and ransomware executes in under 5 days, the SOC is the difference between a contained incident and a catastrophic breach.


Introduction

The current threat landscape leaves no room for passive security postures. Ransomware attacks continue to escalate, with average breach costs reaching $4.88 million globally and $9.77 million in healthcare. Attackers are faster than everβ€”median time to data exfiltration has compressed to 2 days, with 45% of threat actors stealing data within 24 hours of initial access.

Two capabilities anchor effective cyber defence: the Security Operations Centre (SOC) for continuous detection and monitoring, and Digital Forensics & Incident Response (DFIR) for containment and investigation when breaches occur. Together, they form an integrated defence that detects threats early, responds rapidly, and learns from every incident.

This article examines why SOC and DFIR capabilities are strategically essentialβ€”not as cost centres, but as business-critical functions that determine whether organisations survive modern cyber threats.


The Threat Landscape: Why Detection is Non-Negotiable

The Current State

The asymmetry between attackers and defenders has never been starker:

Threat Metric
2024/2025 Data

Average breach cost

$4.88M (10% YoY increase)

Healthcare breach cost

$9.77M

Median attacker dwell time

5–10 days

Ransomware dwell time

5 days

Time to data exfiltration

2 days (45% within 24 hours)

Breaches involving cloud data

82%

Attacks using stolen credentials

16% (longest to detect at 292 days)

Sources: IBM Cost of a Data Breach 2024, Mandiant M-Trends 2024, Unit 42 IR Report 2024

Evolving Adversary Tradecraft

Modern threat actors have professionalised their operations:

  • Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS): Groups like LockBit, BlackCat/ALPHV, and Qilin operate with business efficiency. 87% of ransomware attacks now involve double extortionβ€”encryption plus data theft

  • Living-off-the-land (LOTL): Adversaries use legitimate tools (PowerShell, WMI, RDP) to evade detection and blend with normal operations

  • Supply chain compromise: The Snowflake breach affected 165+ customer organisations through a single platform compromise

  • AI-enhanced attacks: GenAI is lowering barriers to sophisticated phishing, deepfake social engineering, and automated reconnaissance

  • Identity-focused attacks: Credential theft and MFA bypass remain primary initial access vectors

The Detection Imperative

Prevention alone is insufficient. Attackers need one successful entry point; defenders must protect every surface. Detection inverts this asymmetryβ€”catching threats mid-execution, limiting dwell time, and shrinking the window for damage.

Without effective detection:

  • Threats dwell undetected for weeks or months

  • Minor footholds escalate into full domain compromise

  • Data exfiltration completes before response begins

  • Remediation is incomplete, leading to reinfection (67% of inadequately remediated breaches see repeat incidents)


The Role of SOC Monitoring and Detection

What the SOC Provides

The Security Operations Centre functions as the organisation's central nervous system for threat detection. It provides:

Capability
Function

Continuous monitoring

24/7 visibility across endpoints, network, cloud, and identity

Alert triage

Distinguishing true threats from noise

Threat hunting

Proactive search for undetected adversary activity

Detection engineering

Building and tuning rules to catch evolving threats

Incident escalation

Triggering response workflows when threats are confirmed

Core Technology Stack

Effective SOCs integrate multiple detection layers:

  • SIEM/XDR: Centralised log aggregation, correlation, and alerting (Sentinel, Splunk, Defender XDR)

  • EDR: Endpoint visibility, behavioural detection, and response capabilities

  • NDR: Network traffic analysis and lateral movement detection

  • SOAR: Automated response playbooks and case management

  • Threat Intelligence: Real-time feeds on emerging TTPs and IOCs

The Human Element

Technology alone doesn't make a SOC effective. Skilled analysts provide:

  • Contextual understanding of the environment

  • Judgment calls on ambiguous alerts

  • Hypothesis-driven threat hunting

  • Detection logic tuning based on environmental baselines

  • Escalation decisions that balance speed with accuracy

SOC Models

Model
Description
Best For

In-house SOC

Fully internal team and infrastructure

Large enterprises with resources and talent

Managed SOC (MSSP)

Outsourced monitoring and alerting

Organisations lacking internal capability

MDR

Managed detection with active response

Mid-market needing detection + response

Hybrid

Internal team augmented by external services

Organisations scaling capability

{% hint style="info" %} Key insight: Organisations with dedicated SOC capabilities and tested incident response plans save an average of $248,000 per breach. Those using extensive AI and automation save $2.2 million. {% endhint %}


Incident Response: Speed Determines Outcome

Why Response Time Matters

When a threat is detected, the response window is measured in minutes, not hours. Ransomware can encrypt critical systems within hours of execution. Data exfiltration often completes before defenders know a breach occurred.

Effective incident response delivers:

  • Containment β€” Isolating affected systems before lateral movement completes

  • Eradication β€” Removing persistence mechanisms and attacker access

  • Recovery β€” Restoring operations from a validated clean state

  • Evidence preservation β€” Maintaining forensic integrity for investigation

The SOC-DFIR Handoff

SOC and DFIR operate as an integrated workflow:

Response Readiness

Organisations that prepare for incidents fare significantly better:

  • Tabletop exercises β€” Regular scenario-based practice builds muscle memory

  • Documented playbooks β€” Pre-defined procedures reduce decision time under pressure

  • Automated containment β€” SOAR-driven isolation removes human latency from critical actions

  • Communication plans β€” Stakeholder, legal, and regulatory notification procedures ready to execute

{% hint style="warning" %} Law enforcement engagement matters: Ransomware victims who involved law enforcement saved approximately $1 million in breach costs, and 63% avoided paying ransom entirely. {% endhint %}


Digital Forensics: Understanding What Happened

Beyond Containment

Stopping an attack is necessary but insufficient. Without understanding how the breach occurred, organisations remain vulnerable to repeat incidents.

Digital forensics provides:

  • Root cause identification β€” How did the attacker gain initial access?

  • Scope determination β€” What systems, accounts, and data were compromised?

  • Timeline reconstruction β€” What actions did the attacker take, and when?

  • Attribution β€” What TTPs indicate which threat actor or campaign?

  • Evidence preservation β€” Maintaining chain of custody for legal or regulatory needs

Operational Value

Forensic findings feed directly back into defensive operations:

Finding
Defensive Action

Initial access vector identified

Patch vulnerability, improve email security, enforce MFA

Lateral movement path mapped

Segment network, restrict privileged access

Persistence mechanisms discovered

Update detection rules, hunt for similar artifacts

Data exfiltration confirmed

Scope notification requirements, engage legal

TTPs documented

Map to MITRE ATT&CK, build detection coverage

Forensic capability is increasingly mandatory:

  • GDPR: 72-hour notification requires rapid scope determination

  • SEC Cyber Rules: 4-day disclosure for material incidents

  • DORA: 24-hour major incident reporting for financial entities

  • HIPAA/PCI-DSS: Investigation and documentation requirements

Without forensic capability, organisations cannot answer the questions regulators, insurers, and legal counsel will ask.


Building Capability: Bridging the Skills Gap

The Challenge

The cybersecurity skills shortage remains acute. Many organisations lack the resources to staff a full SOC or DFIR team. Analysts are often undertrained, overwhelmed by alert volume, and burning out.

Practical Solutions

For resource-constrained organisations:

Approach
Investment
Outcome

MDR services

Variable (often affordable for SMEs)

Expert monitoring + response without headcount

CISA resources

Free

Foundational frameworks and guidance

Vendor training (Splunk, Microsoft, CrowdStrike)

Free to low-cost

Platform-specific skills

Community platforms (TryHackMe, LetsDefend)

$0–200/year

Hands-on analyst skill development

For organisations with existing teams:

  • Detection engineering focus β€” Train analysts to build and tune detections, not just triage alerts

  • Purple team exercises β€” Collaborative attack simulation validates and improves detection coverage

  • Cross-training β€” SOC analysts benefit from understanding DFIR; DFIR practitioners benefit from understanding detection engineering

  • Automation investment β€” SOAR reduces manual workload, freeing analysts for higher-value work

Building a Sustainable Program

The goal is not just filling seatsβ€”it's building capability that scales:

  1. Start with MDR or MSSP if internal resources are limited

  2. Invest in training to grow internal expertise over time

  3. Automate repetitive tasks to maximise analyst effectiveness

  4. Document everythingβ€”playbooks, detections, lessons learned

  5. Measure what matters: MTTD, MTTR, detection coverage, false positive rates


Strategic Recommendations

Immediate Actions

  1. Deploy or optimise SIEM/XDR β€” Centralised visibility is foundational

  2. Implement EDR across all endpoints β€” No visibility means no detection

  3. Document incident response procedures β€” Plans tested before incidents occur

  4. Establish law enforcement relationships β€” Before you need them

  5. Run tabletop exercises β€” Quarterly at minimum

Medium-Term Investments

  1. Build detection engineering capability β€” Move from reactive triage to proactive detection

  2. Integrate SOAR β€” Automate containment and reduce response latency

  3. Develop threat hunting program β€” Find adversaries that evade automated detection

  4. Map detection coverage to ATT&CK β€” Identify and prioritise gaps

  5. Establish forensic readiness β€” Tools, training, and evidence preservation procedures

Long-Term Considerations

The threat landscape will continue evolving:

  • AI-powered attacks will increase in sophistication and volume

  • Identity-based attacks will intensify as perimeters dissolve

  • Supply chain risk will require deeper vendor security integration

  • Regulatory requirements will expand, and enforcement will increase

Organisations that invest in SOC and DFIR capability today are building the foundation to adapt to tomorrow's threats.


Conclusion

SOC and DFIR are not optional capabilitiesβ€”they are strategic necessities that determine organisational resilience. The data is clear:

  • Organisations with effective detection and response capabilities experience lower breach costs

  • Rapid containment prevents minor incidents from becoming catastrophic breaches

  • Forensic understanding prevents repeat incidents and satisfies regulatory requirements

  • Investment in people, process, and technology delivers a measurable return

The question is not whether your organisation will face a cyber incident, but whether you will detect it in time, respond effectively, and learn from it.

Detection is not a cost centre. It is the capability that determines whether your organisation weathers the inevitable attackβ€”or becomes another case study in what happens when threats go unnoticed.


Build the SOC. Train the team. Test the plan. The adversaries aren't waiting.


References

Last updated