Windows Malware Detection Playbook
Introduction
In today’s rapidly evolving threat landscape, malware remains one of the most persistent and dangerous threats to enterprise security. Cybercriminals continuously develop sophisticated malware variants that evade traditional security controls, exploit vulnerabilities, and compromise sensitive data. As organisations increasingly adopt cloud-based infrastructures, hybrid environments, and remote work models, the attack surface expands, making proactive malware detection more critical than ever.
Effective malware detection capabilities and processes are essential for identifying and mitigating threats before they escalate into full-scale security incidents. A robust detection framework combines behavioural analytics, endpoint monitoring, threat intelligence, and machine learning to detect known and unknown malware strains. Additionally, integrating advanced security solutions such as Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Extended Detection and Response (XDR), and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions enhances visibility and response capabilities.
To stay ahead of adversaries, security teams must adopt a proactive approach by leveraging threat-hunting methodologies, forensic analysis, and automation-driven incident response. A well-defined malware detection process not only minimises the risk of operational disruptions and data breaches but also strengthens an organisation’s overall cybersecurity posture.
Table of Contents
Initial Malware Detection
Detect Unusual Process Executions
Detect Processes Launched from Temporary Directories
Advanced Suspicious Command Detection
Persistence Mechanisms
Registry Key Modifications
Scheduled Tasks Creation
Advanced Startup Folder Monitoring
Privilege Escalation and Credential Theft
Suspicious LSASS Access
Mimikatz-Style Activities
Advanced Credential Dumping Detection
Lateral Movement Detection
Remote Execution Using PsExec
Network Shares Access
Lateral Movement via WMI
Data Exfiltration Indicators
Large Data Transfers to External Destinations
Use of File Compression Tools
DNS Tunneling Detection
Post-Incident Investigation
Correlation of File Hashes
Compromised User Accounts
Incident Timeline Reconstruction
Conclusion
This playbook provides a structured approach to investigating malware compromises in a Windows enterprise environment using KQL (Kusto Query Language) queries. Each section focuses on a specific detection and analysis phase with multiple query options and detailed descriptions.
1. Initial Malware Detection
The initial phase involves identifying potential signs of compromise, such as suspicious file execution or network activities.
Query Option 1: Detect Unusual Process Executions
Description: This query looks for encoded or obfuscated commands executed by common scripting tools. The expected result includes timestamps, device names, and command lines associated with the execution.
Query Option 2: Detect Processes Launched from Temporary Directories
Description: Identifies processes launched from temporary directories, which are commonly used by malware. The expected result highlights potential malicious file execution paths.
Query Option 3: Advanced Suspicious Command Detection
Description: Uses regex matching for advanced detection of suspicious commands often seen in malware activities. Results include details on command-line patterns and associated accounts.
2. Persistence Mechanisms
Malware often establishes persistence to survive reboots or logoffs.
Query Option 1: Registry Key Modifications
Description: Detects modifications to common registry keys used for persistence. Results show changes in specific keys, including the associated device and value data.
Query Option 2: Scheduled Tasks Creation
Description: Searches for the creation of scheduled tasks, a frequent persistence method. Results display task creation commands with the initiating process details.
Query Option 3: Advanced Startup Folder Monitoring
Description: Monitors files added to startup folders, which can indicate persistence attempts. Results display suspicious files with paths and timestamps.
3. Privilege Escalation and Credential Theft
Detecting attempts to elevate privileges or steal credentials.
Query Option 1: Suspicious LSASS Access
Description: Detects tools attempting to access LSASS for credential dumping. The result highlights the initiating processes targeting LSASS.
Query Option 2: Mimikatz-Style Activities
Description: Flags process commands associated with Mimikatz. Results include timestamps, devices, and command details.
Query Option 3: Advanced Credential Dumping Detection
Description: Expands detection to include custom tools for credential theft. Results show command lines and related accounts.
4. Lateral Movement Detection
Malware may attempt to move laterally within the environment.
Query Option 1: Remote Execution Using PsExec
Description: Identifies the use of PsExec for remote execution. Results include IP addresses and command lines used.
Query Option 2: Network Shares Access
Description: Detects executable files accessed on network shares. Results highlight potential lateral movement activities.
Query Option 3: Lateral Movement via WMI
Description: Detects usage of WMI for remote execution across systems. Results display command-line details and initiating accounts.
5. Data Exfiltration Indicators
Detecting signs of data exfiltration is critical for assessing impact.
Query Option 1: Large Data Transfers to External Destinations
Description: Flags large data transfers to public IP addresses. Results include data volume, destination IPs, and associated processes.
Query Option 2: Use of File Compression Tools
Description: Detects the use of compression tools, often used before exfiltration. Results show the execution details of compression commands.
Query Option 3: DNS Tunneling Detection
Description: Identifies potential DNS tunneling by analysing unusually long domain names with high query counts. Results display devices and domains.
6. Post-Incident Investigation
Once the malware activity is contained, investigate further to understand its scope and origin.
Query Option 1: Correlation of File Hashes
Description: Identifies devices where known malicious files were present. Results show file hashes, paths, and timestamps.
Query Option 2: Compromised User Accounts
Description: Tracks activity related to compromised accounts. Results include login types, statuses, and device associations.
Query Option 3: Incident Timeline Reconstruction
Description: Combines multiple data sources to create a timeline of activities on compromised devices. Results provide a holistic view of the incident.
Conclusion
The playbook offers a good approach to detecting and analysing malware compromises in a Windows enterprise network. However, its usefulness depends on the environment and tools at your disposal. For an environment where KQL is an option, the queries may require some adaptation to specific data sources and infrastructure setup.
Last updated